<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Not Just Use Mechanical Turk Myself for Ghostwriting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentspooling.net/blog/2007/08/23/why-not-just-use-mechanical-turk-myself-for-ghostwriting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentspooling.net/blog/2007/08/23/why-not-just-use-mechanical-turk-myself-for-ghostwriting/</link>
	<description>CSN News and Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben P</title>
		<link>http://www.contentspooling.net/blog/2007/08/23/why-not-just-use-mechanical-turk-myself-for-ghostwriting/comment-page-1/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentspooling.net/blog/?p=22#comment-1897</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t have said it better myself Liz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself Liz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.contentspooling.net/blog/2007/08/23/why-not-just-use-mechanical-turk-myself-for-ghostwriting/comment-page-1/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentspooling.net/blog/?p=22#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>Personally I don&#039;t see why anyone would want to go through all of that trouble when CSN makes it so easy and stress free. Having dealt with writers and submitting requests in the past, it is so nice to not have to mess with all that anymore.

I mean sure you might save a tiny bit of money by doing it yourself, but let&#039;s face it - time is money, so in reality it makes better business sense to use the full service articles - especially now that they are at an even lower price. That&#039;s just my opinion though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I don&#8217;t see why anyone would want to go through all of that trouble when CSN makes it so easy and stress free. Having dealt with writers and submitting requests in the past, it is so nice to not have to mess with all that anymore.</p>
<p>I mean sure you might save a tiny bit of money by doing it yourself, but let&#8217;s face it &#8211; time is money, so in reality it makes better business sense to use the full service articles &#8211; especially now that they are at an even lower price. That&#8217;s just my opinion though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Pate</title>
		<link>http://www.contentspooling.net/blog/2007/08/23/why-not-just-use-mechanical-turk-myself-for-ghostwriting/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Pate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentspooling.net/blog/?p=22#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>As a member that has used mturk, I am thrilled to only have to use the CSN interface :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member that has used mturk, I am thrilled to only have to use the CSN interface <img src='http://www.contentspooling.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
